In preparation for the upcoming production release of our
first mechanical pencil, I thought it would be a good idea to share our experiences,
good and bad when it came to adapting a pen into a pencil. Like the title says,
not everything’s going to work out the first time you try it. The journey with
the Retraktable is one such example. Initially, this blog post was going to be “3
Things That Went Right, 1 That Didn’t”, but then I realized there might be a
lot more that didn’t go “right” than just one thing. In any case, let it be
known that a lot more can go wrong when you attempt to take a product from “idea”
to an actual physical specimen.
The best place to start is probably all the way back at the
beginning. It’s hard to say when the first request for a pencil was sent to us,
probably shortly after the Bolt Kickstarter. Needless to say, a pencil has been
in the Top 5 Most Requested list for a LONG time. Our biggest concern was
making sure we had a product that met our standards but also fulfilled a lot of
the peculiarities of the pencil crowd. It’s also a bit daunting when the bar has
been set in terms of a metal mechanical pencil, and Rotring has been doing that
for decades. Suffice to say, we sat down to prototype something that resembled
a pencil in early 2018, and it’s taken us nearly three years to see those
prototypes be realized into a working pencil that meets our standards.
Our initial planning stages really looked internally at our
current retractable products for inspiration because we knew there’d be a contingent
of people who would seek out pen and pencil sets or at least something resembling
that type of product. We didn’t want to design a pencil, just to turn around
and need to design a pen based on that pencil a year down the road. We also
didn’t have the capacity to tackle a pen and pencil design at the same time. Adapting
a current product into a pencil using an “off-the-shelf” pencil mechanism
quickly became the driving thought process at this stage.
The Bolt was eliminated pretty early on for a few reasons,
but mainly due to its actuation method. Potential customers either love it or
hate it, there really isn’t any middle ground. We didn’t think it would be as popular
as a traditional-style mechanical pencil. Based on the available pencil
mechanisms we could easily source in bulk quantities; we were left with the EDK
and Retrakt. Ultimately the EDK was removed from consideration due to its size
because it would require some pretty major modification to get that pen to work
with the pencil mechanisms we had identified. That left the Retrakt as the only
candidate for adaptation.
Once we had decided on the Retrakt as the pen we’d be
adapting, we began to look at the specifics of how that adaptation would go.
Ideally, we wanted to make as few changes to the pen as possible, but we needed
a functional pencil as the outcome. The standard Schmidt SKM 88 click mechanism
would need to be adapted by removing the miniature ball bearing that locks the mechanism
into place. We’d also need to machine an internal locating collar out of Delrin
because the fit of the mechanism we intended on using wasn’t as precise as we
wanted.
Our first iteration of a physical prototype was an
interesting mess of parts that we had cobbled together, and we got a somewhat
working pencil out of it. The first problem soon reared its head, while we had
identified the minimum number of parts needed to adapt the Retrakt to a pencil,
we couldn’t productionize those parts. The pencil mechanisms from Schmidt have
massive allowable tolerances in terms of length of throw which completely
eliminates our ability to use precision-built adaptation kits. We put our “working”
prototype kit into ten different Retrakts and only two would work immediately
with another three functioning if we fiddled around enough but the other five would
never function. It was a massive headache. So, we went back to square one and
began dissecting each part to see what we would need to manufacture or source
to get a functioning adaptation kit. Here’s the list of adaptations we ended up
with by the time we finished the first prototype run.
- Disassembly of SKM 88, removal of ball bearing, reassembly of SKM 88.
- Sourcing a 3-inch steel tensioner spring.
- Replace rear pencil mechanism plunger with machined aluminum plunger.
- Machined Delrin locating collar.
- Machined Delrin tensioner spring spacer.
Used in conjunction, these adaptations would allow the
Schmidt DSM 2006 pencil mechanism to work MOST of the time with a MAJORITY of
existing Retrakt pen bodies. We adapted around 300 pens into pencils and sold a
prototype batch that we’d tested to ensure proper function, then we sat down to
discuss the project.
Before we move on to the next phase of our process, I’ll
address the Eraser Issue, as it came to be known. There was a long internal
debate over the inclusion of a built-in eraser. We went round and round on this
topic in every meeting we had during the initial prototype phase. Ultimately,
there were two reasons we settled on not using a built-in eraser. The first reason
was the lack of availability of a high-quality eraser we could source in bulk
quantities. The second reason was external feedback we received from pencil
users who said they’d much prefer we eliminate the built-in eraser especially
if we supplied a high-quality eraser like a hi-polymer eraser. You’d think this
would have taken a few weeks to come to this decision, if memory serves this decision
didn’t get made until early November 2018, months after we started the prototyping
process.
The first batch of 300 Retraktable mechanical pencils sold over
the 2018 holidays as quickly as we could list them on the website. We were
apprehensive about the customer feedback, and worried customers would end up
having issues with function if they tried to make tweaks to the operation of
the pencil. We had far fewer customers lodge complaints than we expected, but
it was still enough complaints about the future of the Retraktable to be one of the
main topics in our 2019 planning meeting. We decided to put the entire project
on pause, largely due to the amount of work each adaptation kit required combined
with the fact that the kits weren’t always successful which led to a sub-par
product. But we knew it wouldn’t be long before we revived the product and
decided to move forward with it.
In our 2020 planning meeting, the Retraktable was moved from
the back burner to a new prototype phase. We threw out everything we’d done in
the past, including the Schmidt DSM 2006 mechanism. Throughout this latest
prototype phase, we chose to look at things a little differently. We still
wanted to adapt the Retrakt because we’d received so much positive feedback on that
pen being the basis for the design. However, we knew we’d need to make some
major changes that wouldn’t be a true adaptation rather the Retraktable would
be a mechanical pencil that looked like the Retrakt and ultimately only share
one main component: the upper barrel.
What did we end up doing when we pushed into the final stages of prototyping the new Retraktable? We did a lot.
First, we decided to use the mostly metal Schmidt DSM 2007
in lieu of the mostly plastic DSM 2006. The DSM 2007 has a threaded body that
would hold the mechanism in place removing the need for a locating collar or
tensioner spring. But in using these threads, we’d need to machine a lower
barrel that was threaded for the mechanism and couldn’t be used as a pen. But
we could still use the upper barrel along with our standard clip and screws.
Second, we decided that it would make more sense for us to
make our own click mechanism based on the Schmidt SKM 88. It would be nearly identical,
but we could make it out of aluminum and therefore anodize every piece of it.
We’d machine both the button and housing in-house, use a small spring between
the button and housing, and keep everything in place with a C-clip capture
system. This allowed free movement of the mechanism and gives it the “feel” of
a standard mechanical pencil “button”.
Lastly, we decided to source stamped 6061 aluminum clips for
the pencils. This was a bit of an afterthought, but because we were adding a
mechanism that could be anodized, we figured it would be apropos if we had a
clip that could be anodized giving us the option of doing a single color Retraktable.
The sample clips came back with a lovely spring to them, and we knew they’d be
perfect for the pencil.
We’d also received a lot of requests for a slim version of whatever pencil we decided to release. With some CAD magic, Bill and Josh were able to get a slimmer version of the Retraktable (now called the Retraktable Slim) that used all of the same parts. We’ll see about adapting the Retrakt V2 to a slim version in the future, anything’s possible.
Two years after the first Retraktable prototypes were sold,
we released the latest Retraktable prototypes. I guess technically they’re the
Retraktable V2 prototypes. We sold about 200 Retraktable Slim and 250
Retrktable Standards over the 2020 holidays. We added multiple grip profiles,
and anodized them in a variety of options. We plan to launch the full production
versions of the Retraktable and Retraktable Slim in June 2020 with several different
color combinations. The rest of 2020 will see the release of multiple special
release versions of the Retraktable and Retraktable Slim; they’ll be something
for everyone.
I’ve learned that it doesn’t always work the first time, but I’ve also learned that we’re pretty resilient and if the idea and design have merit, we’ll pursue it. We’re doing that right now on multiple projects and potential additions to current pens. The first few go-rounds might not be successes, but we’re not going to stop trying new things. We’re stubborn like that.
No comments:
Post a Comment